Paranormal in the Bible >> EARS - Evidence of Alien contact Revealed in Scripture >> Religion, Truth and Ufology
Religion, Truth and Ufology
Post by truthufo on Sep 15th, 2004, 5:52pm
I think Religion is a big problem in our way of foresight. I think because of the idea of a apocalypse of some kind that a lot of people just don't see very far into our future advancements and evolvements. I Saw this "Interview with the alien" video and I thought 'Victor' was somewhat Genius. But when he referred to the "Grey's" Treating US like dogs I did not agree. If The stories are true than the gery's are doing Harm to us much like "we" use cattle, As appose to the way we relate to dogs. Dogs are friends and always will be. We may have control now and might for sometime, But can one foresee what will come of this. Some day dogs will be there own race and they will still befriend us as they always have. Anyone who does not foresee the evolution of dogs/ourselves into the future, Has a huge brick wall of NOW in his path. If "we" As a race Human, Could get over our Extinction Idea or apocalypse fears, we may then see our direction and realize we are going to carry on and go fourth. We are going to learn how to get to the other planets/worlds and change them to sustain us. "God" Gave room to carry on and live, not to over crowd a world and die. We all know our past and we know that long long ago, People "US" thought the ocean was the edge of existence . We later found other land due to our "being pushed" to extend beyond what we where at that time, IE DOMINATION. Jin 2003"Domination is crucial for evolution, Thus it is logical to assume dominance is predominant throughout the Universe" This would make the possibility of aliens being hostile, Heavily outweigh the possibility of them being friendly.
The ability to dominate Earth has helped US to evolve to a state where we might now be able to dominate mars and other worlds. Is it logical to assume that We can dominate this world but by the time we use up all its resources our entire race, would die due to planet Polution and lack of space technology? Or is it more logical to assume. by the time any race dominates a planet and gets large enough to use it all up , should be smart enough at that point to have the space technology to dominate other worlds? If we could realize that Technology is a natural Occurrence, we could realize that it is not only US that is pushed to dominate other worlds but, it is in gods nature to push US to advance in that Direction and beyond.
Religion, Truth and Ufology Part 2
Post by truthufo on Sep 15th, 2004, 5:56pm
John lear. Now I have read up on my lear/lazar/William cooper and Dr. Dan Burisch. Two of whom are dead now. but all these men had very nearly the same story. One question comes to mind when reading up on lear. At no point in time have i read just how lear knows what he claims to know. Of coarse he says who he is and what he does, but he never said exactly how he learned of this information,, does he?? If you have any transcripts of him stating how he got the information rather through a debriefing or how? Let me know please.. I know this is all going to come out in the wash over the next 15 years, along with government controlling just how the info gets out and just how we the public perceives it. But I am sure they cant keep it down to much longer. I think the reason I believe lear/lazar is because they dont seem to be psychologists, yet they're claims of how the "mind control" aspects goes fits exactly with my ninjitsu mind manipulation arts. And fits like a glove to the mind manipulation of the "masses" That started way way long ago. This art started with "mind slayers" Who where employed by the kings of the times , to control the perceptions of the mass groups of people. For instance I read a story In one of my mind control books that was talking about a war in or around japan long ago, Where the king made offerings to the families of 3000 men, that if they commit suicide they're families will be cared for . Now I cant find the story right now thumbing through my books for exact names but, the 3000 men dressed exactly like what the enemies where warring making the enemies think they where part of they're huge army. I guess the king knew he could not win against such a huge army through force, so they used mind tricks. Now that the ninja had all this mystical propaganda built up around them. All 3000 of these men cut they're own thoughts , when the rest of the army saw this they thought that a ninja had cast a spell on them and they fled. Now I could be off here and there about the facts if you want later i can go get the names so you can see the exact deal I am referring to. But what I am getting at is the simplistics in dealing with perceptions of a mass crowd. I think the fact that lazar and lear etc claims fit the ideas of government mass mind control yet they don't go on and on into that aspect they just say key words about it here and there. I would have to agree that our government is well aware of this mass population mind control and controlled perception aspects, And of coarse they are using these tactics.
Lets just say lazar and lear are full of crap none of this ever happened roswell was all hype. But tomorrow december of 2003 the air force finds a crashed craft with ETs inside, Does anyone in this world think they are going to flash it on the CBS news asap?? Or is it more likely they would hold the info due to its possible impact on human society? One would think the Government would want to control the release of this information as well as the perception of of this information, and until they could control it they would hold it all back. I would also add the ONLY reason it would effect human society is because of RELIGION only. It is RELIGION that bounds us all from going to the future. It is RELIGION that causes a barrier in our minds as is why we cant visualize into the future to see our "tomorrow" why? Because Most of us Humans RELIGIONs consist of an apocalyptic future, thus we have no future so why look passed tomorrow? Why face the facts that we will be forced to dominate other worlds by means of our worlds decay. I "jin" Think that is the reason everyone thinks "nnaahhh" We wont move to mars one day, that is far fetched. If we all thought that Humanity would make it another 5000 years, just where would we visualize ourselves then. I think we could be a lot smarter of beings if we could get over RELIGION, Because it Stops everyone from seeing into "our" far future. Who really thinks we will last long enough to get any farther in technology? Does anyone on earth believe that Humanity will last another 5- 10,000 years from now? Anyone at all?
That brings me to "john lears" statement of the EBEs claim to have created Christ, in light of theyre "Great deception". Maybe they pushed religion to cause a barrier in human technology acceleration. I would ask for logic in this case. and found...
See part 3
Re: Religion, Truth and Ufology part3
Post by truthufo on Sep 15th, 2004, 5:57pm
Ill give you 2 logical answers and one illogical answer to the question "do virgins have babies"
A) Artificial insemination
B) She lied
C) God made it so.
I would say A and B is the only logical answers C is a total joke. A) Logical because it is "Hands down", the ONLY way for a virgin to become pregnant. The question the becomes who and why?
B) Is logical because "I do believe" baby boys where being killed at the time due to prophecy said a new jewish king was to arise. Giving any pregnant woman a very good reason to claim virginity, Because Virgins dont have kids, So by stating she was a virgin maybe the romans said "Ok Marry" And killed the baby next door instead. Then I think Mary was not married at the time so there is another reason to LIE. Though I could be wrong I have not read up on it for some time. But I do believe that John had a sighting of an angel descending from the Heavens a few nights before the conception of jesus, Again My facts could be a bit off but If this is true that Option (A) would explain the sighting as well as The special powers Jesus was said to have had. I will do more research on this issue but for now I am leaning toward (A) as being most logical.
I will add that Back in "the day", The sky was a very different thing , it was the Heavens and unreachable for man. And fire was the ONLY thing at the time that could produce light. IE light = fire, and Heaven =UP or in the direction of UP or sky. Thus anything descending from the Heavens was coming from the sky and anything descending from the heavens that was of fire was of light! Why is this not Obvious to Johnny Q public I guess we are going backwards in evolution due to the endless Human stupidity of Religion.. Why is it that the Humans of Yesterday made a huge ASSUMPTION about gods from Heavens, and the Humans of today will base they're entire lives upon the assumption of some Neanderthals?
People are so blind they claim to believe in the bible, yet when the bible says something came from the sky and told me blah blah blah, we dismiss it entirely and think to our self's they must have been able to see god back then, but now we don't get to see him any more/: Lmao. How stupid could Humans truly be?
For thous smarter Humans who can clearly see the bible for what it is. We can get many good facts from the bible that the others are just completely blinded to, due to Human perception of the bible. And what a better weapon for the governments to use against the people who already built this weapon of belief against they're self's. Why don't we the Government use this weapon that is already in place to strike the Humans? Use they're minds against them.
Jin UFO_Truth 2003 " If we are to believe in anything "not cretin", than we are susceptible to our belief being used as a weapon against our minds. When I see some facts Ill start believing in something, For now I am still a nihilist"
Post by truthufo on Sep 15th, 2004, 6:06pm
The following post is a bit Harsh But, I wrote it just after 9/11 and everybody was all about blaming Our evil doing and saying god did it because how bad we have been hawgwash!! And of course Someone had the gull to try to convert me to Islam and they told me it is Not Islam that does terrorism, it is bad people. I then asked " Will I go to hell if I don't convert? Or will I not be able to go to heaven?" And they said "You have to be Islam to go to heaven". So this is what I think about Islam among other religions Not using terrorism.
"I believe most religions use fear/terror, to accomplish
They're many objectives. And its time someone points out the
facts. I have taken it upon my self to help pull some heads
out of some Religious Ass.
"freedom of religion", to use fear ploys To obtain their objectives, Than they should by no means be Used on children. To tell a six-year-old child "they will die
And not be allowed in heaven and maybe even go to a burning hell, If they do not except and believe this "one and only word of god" Is terrorism by definition. One of the many "one and only words Of god" that are out there, and use terrorism. How is it freedom To use forms of mental terrorism on children to brainwash them
from the day they are Borne?" (jin 12/4/02)
Religions Use of mental terrorism and brain washing.
(("Are they all cults?? If They Use Any forms of
Terrorism does that make them Terrorists?"))
The threatened use of force or violence by a person or
An organized group against people or property with the
Intention of intimidating or coercing societies or
Governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
n : the systematic use of violence as a means to
Intimidate or coerce societies or governments.
(1.)(The threatened use of force or violence by a person or
An organized group against people.) = May be as simple as
Implying eternal d**nation (hell/Violence) a violent place
For the after of thou who don't follow this "one and only
Word of god" Or simply not being excepted into heaven
When one passes, thus dieing the "second death"
"It is not only human nature to be afraid of death,
But it is the nature of all life and the instinct to survive,
That drives all our desires to never die. Our Instincts tell Us to carry on and never give up. To die and come to any
Sort of an end is against our will to survive. Even if it is Death we are surviving. It is natural for us all to devise Religions and ways of surviving death. I think terrorism can Be the use of fear that is in us all, of coming to an Eternal end. Even worse Forced into a violent Hell for not Believing or having faith. Used Against us All To lour us into someone's Belief system, this type of terrorism is by far the most discrete brainwashing cults out there. A prime example would be the Gospel, and Accepting Jesus, and there beliefs is the one and only way into Heaven, Or the Only way you can "follow your lively instincts" and Survive death." (jin 02)
(2.)(TERRORISM) (Against people with the intention of intimidating
Or "coercing" societies, often for ideological reasons.)=
So if any organized group "Coerces" a society for any reason,
Is it a form of terrorism? I think the number 1 definition for
"Coercing," says it all.
1.To force to act or think in a certain way by use of pressure,
Threats, or intimidation; compel.
2.To dominate, restrain, or control forcibly: coerced the strikers
Into compliance. See Synonyms at force.
3.To bring about by force or threat: efforts to coerce agreement.
See part 2 Religion Brainwashing
Religion brainwashing part 2
Post by truthufo on Sep 15th, 2004, 6:07pm
Coerce \Co*erce"\, v. t. [imp. & p. p. Coerced; p. pr. & vb. n.
Coercing.] [L. co["e]rcere; co- + arcere to shut up, to press
Together. See Ark.]
1. To restrain by force, especially by law or
Authority; to repress; to curb. --Burke. Punishments are manifold,
That they may coerce this profligate sort. --Ayliffe.
2. To compel or constrain to any action; as, to coerce a man to
vote for a certain candidate.
3. To compel or enforce; as, to coerce obedience.
Syn: To Coerce, Compel. Usage: To compel denotes to urge on by
force which cannot be resisted. The term applies equally to physical
And moral force; as, compelled by hunger; compelled adverse
Circumstances; compelled by parental affection. Coerce had at first
Only the negative sense of checking or restraining by force; as, to
Coerce a bad man by punishments or a prisoner with fetters. It has
Now gained a positive sense., viz., that of driving a person into the
Performance of some act which is required of him by another; as, to
coerce a man to sign a contract; to coerce obedience. In this sense
(which is now the prevailing one), coerce differs but little from
compel, and yet there is a distinction between them. Coercion is
usually accomplished by indirect means, as threats and intimidation,
physical force being more rarely employed in coercing.
(3.) Brain Washing.. Once you read the definition for this subject, you
Should clearly see that all religions are forms of Brain washing. This
Is why I ask, "Are they All Cults?" And I think the answer can be found
In the following.
Brain·wash·ing (brnwsh, -wôsh)
tr.v. brain·washed, brain·wash·ing, brain·wash·es
To subject to brainwashing.
The process or an instance of brainwashing.
Intensive, forcible indoctrination, usually political or religious,
aimed at destroying a person's basic convictions and attitudes and
replacing them with an alternative set of fixed beliefs.
The application of a concentrated means of persuasion, such as an
advertising campaign or repeated suggestion, in order to develop a
specific belief or motivation.
[Translation of Chinese (Mandarin) x no : x, to wash + no, brain.]
n : forcible indoctrination into a new set of attitudes and beliefs
see part 3
Religion brainwashing part 3
Post by truthufo on Sep 15th, 2004, 6:07pm
cult ( P ) Pronunciation Key (klt)
A religion or religious sect generally considered to be extremist or
false, with its followers often living in an unconventional manner
under the guidance of an authoritarian, charismatic leader.
The followers of such a religion or sect.
A system or community of religious worship and ritual.
The formal means of expressing religious reverence; religious ceremony
and ritual. A usually nonscientific method or regimen claimed by its
originator to have exclusive or exceptional power in curing a particular
disease. Obsessive, especially faddish, devotion to or veneration for a
person, principle, or thing. The object of such devotion.
An exclusive group of persons sharing an esoteric, usually artistic or
[Latin cultus, worship, from past participle of colere, to cultivate.
See kwel-1 in Indo-European Roots.]
cultic or cultish adj.
\Cult\ (k?lt) n .[F. culte, L. cultus care, culture, fr. colere to cultivate.
Cf. Cultus.] 1. Attentive care; homage; worship.
Every one is convinced of the reality of a better self, and of. thecult or
homage which is due to it. --Shaftesbury.
2. A system of religious belief and worship.
That which was the religion of Moses is the ceremonial or cult of the
religion of Christ. --Coleridge.
n 1: adherents of an exclusive system of religious beliefs and practices
2: an interest followed with exaggerated zeal:
"he always follows the latest fads"; "it was all the rage that season"
[syn: fad, craze, furor, furore, rage] 3: a system of religious beliefs
and rituals [syn: religious cult]
"It was once said that satins best trick was to convince the people he
Did not exist. What a better way to lour us into religion, as to claim
It is used for the better and as the only doorway to heaven. In all
There terror ploys and lours, they make it seem as though it is not a
Terror ploy at all. It is only the good word of God that lour you.
I think all these religions are so double standard it's not funny.
These religions are more evil than the Satan that hides in them all.
I think they are more evil by means of slaying the minds of children
And the weak minded, Ex cons, drug dealers and the mental and physically
Abused. Why do you think they focus on thous individuals? To help thous
In need? Try again, try a better way to hide our evil doings maybe.
Excepting funds from the sympathetic, by means of sympathy ploys. As
long as some of the money goes to those in need, it is ok to take some
for our selves, our church "in gods Holy name".Bad examples might One
claim? Or is the entire religion A bad example of a one true God?"
(Jin 2002) www.truthufo.com
copy right 2002 by O.I.O.T.